Interview

Sequoia's Andrew Reed on sourcing generational investments: ElevenLabs, Vanta, Figma, and the craft of board work

Mar 26, 2025 with Andrew Reed

Key Points

  • Andrew Reed has generated approximately $3.75 billion for Sequoia through positions in ElevenLabs, Vanta, Figma, and other companies since joining in 2014, establishing himself as one of the firm's most prolific investors.
  • Reed rejects pre-baked board playbooks in favor of understanding each company's actual bottlenecks and positioning himself as a shock absorber—calibrating when things go well and providing stability when they deteriorate.
  • Sequoia prioritizes holding its best companies long-term rather than optimizing for early ownership stakes, a discipline shaped by a historical 40x Apple return that could have compounded far larger if held longer.
Sequoia's Andrew Reed on sourcing generational investments: ElevenLabs, Vanta, Figma, and the craft of board work

Summary

Andrew Reed joined Sequoia in February 2014 as one of two associates — the finance half of a class designed by partner Pat Grady to pair financial rigor with startup experience. The other associate was Matt Huang, who had already founded and sold a company to Twitter and now runs Paradigm. Reed came from Goldman Sachs, where he describes himself as the headphones-on, Excel-behind-the-screen type who had never taken a one-on-one meeting before in his life.

Harry Stabbings recently called Reed the best investor of the last five to seven years, citing ElevenLabs, Vanta, Figma, Odo, Bold, Clara, and Zapier — with average ownership of roughly 5% across those positions — and estimating Reed has generated approximately $3.75 billion for Sequoia. Reed's first sponsored investment at the firm was Robinhood in 2017. Sequoia also invested in GitHub in 2015, which was acquired in 2017.

Sourcing and differentiation

Reed started posting on Twitter in 2017, when VC was not yet online in the way it is now. His logic was straightforward: at 27, competing for founder attention against Doug Leone, Mike Moritz, and Jim Goetz on name recognition alone was a losing game. The internet, he figured, was an open playing field where a pixelated profile picture obscured your age. The pandemic-era Clubhouse moment accelerated the shift, but Reed was early.

Board philosophy

Reed is deliberate about rejecting the playbook approach. The worst board members, in his view, are those who arrive with a pre-baked system and run every portfolio company through it — playbooks age quickly in a world of accelerating change. His first move after leading an investment is to understand what business he is actually in and where the real bottlenecks are, which he argues you cannot know from a diligence memo alone.

One practical early step he favors is doing an executive search alongside the founder. Grinding a recruiter together on VP of Engineering pipeline is, in his telling, the fastest way to move from opposite sides of the table to the same side.

The board concept he returns to most is the idea of being a shock absorber, a framework he credits to Sequoia partner Roelof Botha. When things are going well, many board members default to cheerleading. Reed's approach is to introduce calibration — pointing out what current-generation companies performing even better are actually doing. When things are going poorly, he argues the most valuable thing is often just getting everyone to take a breath: remind the room that the company has runway, identify what is actually working, and resist the reflexive move to fire the VP of sales when the real issue is product.

Concentration and ownership

Sequoia's stated north star is to be the largest outside shareholder in the most important companies of tomorrow. The preferred sequence is seed, then Series A, with the ability to double and triple down on conviction positions over time. Reed flags a counterintuitive lesson embedded in Sequoia's history: the firm made a 40x return on a $150,000 Apple investment — a single-digit million dollar gain — because they sold too early. That experience shaped an emphasis on holding the truly special companies as long as possible and compounding with them, rather than optimizing for early ownership percentage alone. Being the fourth-largest investor in the most important company of a generation is still a good investment.

Doug Leone's internal framework, which he calls the laws of physics, holds that fund returns are inversely proportional to both team size and fund size. Sequoia has stayed disciplined on both.

Paths into venture

Reed leads Sequoia's growth-stage investing business. His view on hiring is that prior background matters less than the ability to hit the ground running on at least one of four competencies: sourcing, picking, winning deals, and company building. Finance people tend to arrive strong on picking and diligence but have never taken a one-on-one meeting. Startup founders arrive strong on sourcing and winning. What matters is whether someone has the ceiling to eventually max out on all four, and Sequoia's model is to invest in young people over five to six years until that happens.

Underwriting AI

On generative AI, Reed's central observation is structural: unlike prior technology waves that extended distribution gradually, AI launched with full consumer distribution from day one. A billion people logged onto ChatGPT and started using it simultaneously. That creates revenue ramps unlike anything seen before — but also means some of that revenue is easy come, easy go. Each investment decision is genuinely complex in its own right.

On Figma specifically, he flags it as a sleeper with a significant embedded advantage: most of the important creative people in tech are in the app all day. The teaser — "stay tuned" — suggests something is coming but nothing is disclosed.

His closing frame is the one he says Doug Leone offered when Reed first arrived at Sequoia: some things in business never change, and some things change all the time. The job is knowing which is which.