Apple and SpaceX clash over satellite spectrum as Starlink-iPhone deal nears
Mar 31, 2025
Key Points
- SpaceX is pushing the FCC to block Globalstar's spectrum application, threatening Apple's $1 billion satellite infrastructure investment and long-term connectivity ambitions.
- Apple and SpaceX are forced into partnership despite deep tensions: SpaceX needs iPhone integration for Starlink's consumer satellite service, while Apple depends on SpaceX rockets to launch Globalstar's fleet.
- The spectrum fight reveals Apple's vulnerability: Globalstar's aging geocynchronous satellites cannot meet Apple's needs alone, forcing exploration of alternative partnerships with Echostar and Boeing.
Summary
Apple and SpaceX are locked in a regulatory clash over satellite spectrum even as they forge a commercial partnership that neither can afford to break.
The conflict centers on spectrum—the finite airwaves needed to expand satellite-based connectivity. SpaceX has pushed the FCC to block Globalstar's application for spectrum rights that would support Apple's satellite expansion plans. Globalstar, valued at $2.6 billion, is Apple's primary satellite partner. Apple invested over $1 billion in the company last year and now owns roughly 20% of it.
The structural irony runs deep. SpaceX has more satellites in orbit than any competitor—over 550 Starlink satellites providing low-latency connectivity—but it lacks direct iPhone integration. Apple has iPhone distribution and $2 trillion in market value but depends on Globalstar's older, higher-latency satellite network for its emergency texting feature. Starlink's advantage is technical. Its low-earth orbit constellation delivers latency low enough for gaming and FaceTime calls on planes. Globalstar uses geocynchronous satellites, meaning users face significant delays even uploading text messages. Apple's existing satellite service is functional only outdoors and slow to send even small files.
SpaceX and T-Mobile struck a deal that changes the equation. T-Mobile will offer always-on texting in remote areas via Starlink, rolling out this summer on newer iPhones. The deal required Apple's cooperation. iPhone users cannot access the service without Apple building it into iOS, giving Apple effective veto power over SpaceX's consumer satellite play.
Before this partnership, the companies were adversarial. Musk has long resented Apple's control over app distribution and has periodically threatened to build his own phone, a threat he later walked back, saying the idea makes him want to die. Apple's relationship with X has been similarly fraught, centered on advertising spend and content moderation fears. The satellite clash is the latest front in a broader power struggle over who controls the infrastructure between Musk and Tim Cook.
Yet both companies need each other to execute their visions. SpaceX has the satellite constellation and launch capacity. Globalstar itself relies on SpaceX rockets to launch new satellites. Apple has the device market and the ability to integrate features into billions of phones. Analysts say Globalstar alone cannot meet Apple's long-term connectivity ambitions. Apple has also explored partnerships with other operators including Echostar and Boeing, signaling it wants optionality beyond Globalstar.
The regulatory fight over spectrum is thus a proxy for leverage. SpaceX is signaling that Apple's expansion via Globalstar will be slowed or blocked at the FCC. Apple's $1 billion investment in Globalstar and the new satellite fleet it funded are at stake. The outcome will shape whether Apple can build independent satellite infrastructure or remains dependent on Starlink's goodwill and capacity.