Interview

Project 11 founder: Google's quantum paper is a watershed moment — Bitcoin devs can't wait any longer

Mar 31, 2026 with Alex Pruden

Key Points

  • Google's quantum research puts Bitcoin's cryptography at risk within six to twelve years: the company demonstrated 6,000 qubits last year, needing only 10,000 to crack Bitcoin's security.
  • Bitcoin's decentralized governance makes quantum migration uniquely difficult compared to Google's 2029 upgrade timeline, forcing the entire network to agree on a post-quantum solution simultaneously.
  • Project 11 is building post-quantum upgrades for existing blockchains rather than launching a new chain, running test suites for Solana and collaborating with the Ethereum Foundation.
Project 11 founder: Google's quantum paper is a watershed moment — Bitcoin devs can't wait any longer

Summary

Google's recent quantum paper put a concrete number on the threat to Bitcoin: you may need only 10,000 physical qubits to run Shor's algorithm and break the cryptography underpinning Bitcoin. Google demonstrated 6,000 qubits last year. That gap is the central concern driving Project 11, a firm positioning itself as the bridge for digital assets to the post-quantum era.

Why Bitcoin is uniquely exposed

Bitanks can roll back transactions, freeze accounts, and layer quantum-vulnerable cryptography on top of other security controls. Bitcoin cannot. One valid quantum-cracked signature hands over Satoshi's coins, Coinbase's holdings, or any cold wallet permanently. There is no fallback. An estimated 15% of all Bitcoin supply — worth hundreds of billions of dollars at current prices — sits in lost or dormant wallets, representing an enormous financial incentive for any actor that cracks the cryptography first.

The incentives cut across governments and private companies. Nation-states running espionage programs would prefer to stay silent about what they have. Pure-play quantum firms need a revenue model. Recovering Satoshi's Bitcoin like buried treasure is a credible scenario.

The China timeline

Project 11's quantum physicist adviser estimates China is at most six to twelve months behind the US in quantum capability. Beijing has effectively consolidated the quantum programs previously scattered across Tencent, Baidu, and other labs into a single classified effort. The question of whether the Chinese Communist Party would respect Bitcoin's philosophical principles of decentralization, if it had the capability to attack it, answers itself.

Bitcoin's governance problem

Google has committed to upgrading all its systems by 2029 — a decision one person can make internally. Bitcoin requires the entire distributed community to first agree there is a problem, then agree on a solution. Ethereum's transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake is the closest precedent: it worked, but it took four years and thousands of contributors. Post-quantum migration is harder because each chain has different technical constraints. Cryptography that works for Bitcoin's slow, app-free architecture may not work for Solana's high-throughput design — a result Project 11 confirmed through its own testing with the Solana Foundation.

Quantum discount on Bitcoin's price

Project 11's founder argues Bitcoin is already trading at a discount because of this risk. Chamath Palihapitiya has made the same point publicly: the quantum threat is a cloud over the asset class that suppresses both current holders and potential new entrants. If the threat were resolved, the argument goes, the price would be materially higher. As 2029 approaches without visible progress, selling pressure could accelerate.

What Project 11 is building

Rather than launching a competing quantum-native chain, Project 11 is focused on upgrading existing assets. The firm has run the first post-quantum test suite for Solana, co-designed a novel post-quantum algorithm for blockchains with the founder of Zcash, and is collaborating with the Ethereum Foundation. A post-quantum wallet is in preparation. The full stack needs attention — protocols, smart contracts, applications, and individual wallets — and the founder is explicit that the migration timeline is unknown, which is precisely the argument for starting now.