Impulse Labs founder on surviving 145% tariffs: hardware startups need breathing room, not panic
May 13, 2025 · Full transcript · This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
Featuring Sam D'Amico
did you uh how'd you sleep last night? Better than than you have for the last few weeks. Yeah, it was it was pretty good. Um I think I got the notification at like midnight on uh on like was it Sunday night or something like that and I was like, "Oh, sweet. I didn't expect that, but I did.
" And that's why I didn't panic. Um but B and so so for clarification, basically we um I guess Ashley Van scooped this that we do a decent amount of our our manufacturing in China. Yeah. um at Impulse, which is the highest performance stove you can buy.
And you can go check out his latest video um on on Core Memory um the Core Memory YouTube channel if you want to learn more. But the fun part about that is um we probably spent a couple weeks being like, "Hey, do we have to pay this 145% tariff on a bunch of the stuff we build?
" Um my immediate calculation was this will stop trade between China and the United States and a bunch of businesses will not like that. And feedback will land from everyone from Ryan Peterson to Yeah. someone that makes Brad Stalls to I don't know. Yeah. Everything. Um so, uh I mean it's only a 90-day pause.
Are you trying to get as much stuff in the country right now? Are you scrambling to import a year's supply or are you thinking that this is the end of the trade war and we're going to be more or less smooth sailing from here on out?
Yeah, I mean I as much as I would So one big thing with hardware companies is like a year supply is like a gazillion dollars. So you gota be you gota be you gota be you gota be a little strategic about what to grab when.
Um, we made sure that our suppliers are multinational and have manufacturing sites in Southeast Asia and other places including places that are likely scoped to have deals of, you know, coming together in terms of in terms of like uh favorable treatment on the tariff side, Vietnam, other places in Southeast Asia, Mexico, etc.
And so basically the the the idea is just like make sure that like all the customers that are already paid, we already told them, hey, we're going to cover this crazy even 145% tariff back in the day or a couple weeks ago. We sent them an email like that. Obviously, it's a little easier for us to do that now.
Um still still holding still holding to that.
Um but uh but yeah, the I think the big thing is like now at least I've got a some breathing room to think conscientiously about what the next steps are for manufacturing of not just our stuff but you know technologies that we're going to be powering other devices with as well.
I mean I know you're you're I know you're a relatively new company, relatively small. Um, but did you actually have to pay any tariffs or were you able to kind of like do a little bit before and a little bit? You You did. Okay. So, break. Oh, yeah. I think we paid the 145% on a couple things actually.
But it's a good we we we the customer the bulk of the customer orders that that are coming in are not subject to that, but like we got um we we've started mass production already. Um, and we're a bunch kind of the beginning of that ends up being kind of samples.
Um, and like VIP influencer units and other fun things like that. We've definitely paid it on a handful of those. Um, the balance of the the balance of even that trunch of units is landing like pretty soon. So, we mostly avoided all of this. Yeah. Um, we're kind of lucky that this was an April thing, not a May thing.
Nice. To be to be blunt.
Um, but yeah, there was there was a lot of fun on that side where I think if our if our battery pack build hadn't gotten delayed like three weeks, there was actually a small chance that we would have had to decide whether or not to pay a very a very large amount of money uh to get them out of the port.
It's better to be lucky than good, right? Uh that's the so the calculation. So I'll give you kind of like what I thought about and what was in my head as this was happening because I don't think I actually panicked at all.
Um I was like this is actually an opportunity to talk frankly about what it's actually like running a hardware startup in 2025 with a large supply chain with a pretty complicated product with with with all these constraints, right? Yeah. And finally people care about me, right?
Like you know finally this is the ma the main news story of the day. So I viewed it as like let's turn the lemons into lemonade. You made the lemon lemons into panic, you coped and it all worked out and I get on odd lots and you know a couple you know. So so that was the opportunity I saw.
And then the second piece was I was like okay so how long does it take for a boat to go from China to the US? and and then I was like, "Okay, so by like the first week of May, there's probably going to be some motion on on on something here. " Mhm.
Um and so I kind of had that in my head of like there is a shock clock going on before we're going to have to do some sort of relaxation of some sort of thing. Mhm.
Um, and looking at the shapes of the negotiations and kind of the various players that were, you know, swarming around and what I've heard privately from I I probably can't say who and what, but like just just just in a sense of like there were there there were there were there were well-known folks that have complicated supply chains that were not going to want to pay under 145% duties on their stuff.
Uh, we saw that pretty quickly with Apple, right? uh and Apple was kind of like the largest thing. They got the exemption pretty early but then there was a lot of other discussion about other companies and at a certain point you know the the noise gets so loud it's deafening.
The climb down from Amazon on the like we won't put the tariffs in the checkout was interesting because it's like I wonder if there was it it kind of felt like maybe there there could have been some negotiation behind the scenes on yeah don't put it in there because we're going to just just come back and kind of thing.
Well, I think they threatened to do it right. They actually rolled out the UI and then they got slammed by the Trump administration for doing that and seeing it as like, hey, you're you're blaming us, but you shouldn't. Yeah.
Never has a The question the question I have is does the the debacle of the last month or so change your long-term planning in a meaningful way?
because we were talking in some we were talking on the show and off the show yesterday around this idea that okay what did we get out of this right and and it didn't it didn't feel like we got a lot out of the Geneva negotiations if anything we got rare earth back which was a reaction to uh the initial tariffs uh and deescalation is just generally good market obviously likes it uh but we just kind of like round trip back to where we were and John made a point which is that okay well if a generation of CEOs like got it into their head the reality of decoupling does it's not happening right now but it could happen but it could and you had a plan during this chaotic period and so I'm sure during that board meeting you guys thought really seriously about hey if this actually sticks what is our plan maybe that wasn't plan A but at least it's a plan in the plan document now and so uh decoupling concepts of a plan.
So, so, so I I actually have this like I I I I I I don't want to get super political, but I do think there's this like Trump tariff cycle like image that that there's a meme there's a meme. It's called like the Trump tariff cycle. It's like I add tariffs. Yep. I like take them off. Art of the deal. Art of the deal.
Yeah. Yeah. Take them away. Art of the deal. Right. Yeah.
So, so I I I actually think there's one interesting wrinkle to this, which is um the the Democrats have been often spa like you could argue they've been off in space with like, you know, you you can blame like wokeness or um some of the more like like some of the Elizabeth Warren coded economic ideas in terms of like, oh, we should just break up all our big tech companies because well, that would be and like there's a bunch of these these sort of like these these sort of ideas that have um let's call it anti-tech or or kind of on the wrong side of a culture war veilance or something like that.
Yep. Um what's been very interesting is or like let's legalize homeless encampments in San Francisco or whatever.
And what's been interesting is systematically um so like Grow SF has like really re and Daniel Lurri and all have really reset San Francisco in a in a positive way because like the they had to get the egg in their face to learn the lesson. Yep.
But I'm actually excited about the Democrats being negatively polarized into a free trade party. Oh, interesting. That's a funny take. Yeah, because um because you know because reaction. Yeah. No, no, that makes a ton of sense. That's funny. Uh I we we have five more minutes.
I want to I want you to walk me through I'm sure you've studied BYD. I'd love to know kind of uh the history of that company, what your takeaways are. um and what it takes to build an American BYD in America and what makes BYD what does that even mean an American BYD?
Why is that different than an American like uh Tesla? Yeah, exactly. Yeah. So, I I spoke to I spoke to an ex Tesla person and I was like I was like, "Would Elon ever build stuff for other people?
" And it's like and I've actually asked this question for for from a number of different folks and I've actually gotten gotten a variety of answers and it's kind of like he'll do it if it's on the main path of like getting something getting to getting to getting to the like vertically integrated goal if that makes if that makes any sense.
But like it's it's unless like unless Tesla was forced by the government to be like you will build tanks or something like that like like that they're not in that business and they're never going to be.
Um, and so if you think of like what what like BYD has in terms of capabilities, it's like it's a car company and a car brand. You can buy a car from them, but like everything inside that car is also like fractally built by them.
Um, so like the infotainment system, they're the manufacturer of that whereas like Quana um like where whereas like Quana or Pegatron or something like that may make that system for Tesla. Yep. Um, and this goes down all the way into the battery cells and all this other stuff.
So there's like they're they're like the most vertically integrated company you could ever imagine. So interesting because you'd think in like a command and control economy you'd be able to force a kuretsu like in Japan even more, right?
You'd be able to force cooperation between a bunch of different companies, but it seems like in China maybe that hasn't happened with BYD. Am I understand? It's it's it's interesting because um I think it's it's the DNA of the place more than there's like a more than more than the policy side.
But then the flip side of it is so BYD makes stuff for other people and that's like what they do generally. That's what they historically did.
They just happened to be a nickel cadmium battery manufacturer that just kept acquiring businesses and like bringing them into the fold until they basically had a car business, a lithium-ion battery business and kind of like all of the all of the like IP needed to build any electric device.
So like that's everything from like a smartphone to a car to like your dreams. for stoves or whatever. And so and so what's really interesting about this is like I can like I could go to a firm like this and I can say hey build me soup to nuts a whole device.
They will commit substantial engineering resources but those engineering resources it's a little bit less like maybe it's it's there's like contract manufacturers in the west and stuff like that but this is like no they'll do it with the BYD parts and the BYD process.
It's it's like they almost have like the best Lego set in in in the world and they're able to leverage all of that IP as just a really high starting point to be able to kind of develop develop all these devices. Yeah. So, I mean, what does it take to build an American version of that?
Should we be even thinking about that as a goal? Um, is that is that a different company or is that a you know, a cultural shift in Tesla's strategy? Where do we go from here? Yeah, I mean there there'd be one way to do it which would be like Defense Production Act says, "Hey, Tesla build for other people.
" But I think that would not go over that would go over like a lead balloon and probably is not a good strategic choice. Yeah. Um um I do not want to accept that idea. I don't think it's a great idea for Tesla for a bunch of reasons.
But um but I do think that there's I've been focused on like what parts of the value chain in kind of the electrified device universe. Mhm. Um and I say that very broadly like this is everything from EVs to stoves to to phones and stuff like that.
Um where where part of the value chain is like not made in the United States really high level of integration both like hardware software etc. And if you have better components you can make better products.
And this is where we realize that on the the appliance industry just if you go and build appliances in the United States today, you buy electronics from China or Germany and all the guts inside.
It's kind of like you're getting um your graphics card from a Taiwanese manufacturer and your motherboard from another Taiwanese manufacturer. Have you taken any trips to Germany, by the way?
They've been asleep at the wheel in many ways at I've I've actually never been to a German factory which is saying something that's judgmental against myself and I intend to fix that soon. Yeah.
Um the I think a lot of what's been going on is all of like China's been just incredibly good at the final assembly and like that part of the value chain.
And it turns out that's where a lot of the software defined technology start intersecting is like automated assembly, computer vision, um like like building all kind of like the firmware and software to make stuff work in an integrated way. And like that's the thing that I think people miss about the car industry.
And this is probably the the thing to say is the the legacy car companies don't build cars like phones whereas Tesla does and China does.
And when and I that's a really broad statement, but it's really like you're building an integrated electronic device, not a bunch of individual boxes designed by different firms that you've like plugged together.
Um, and and you need manufacturers like BYD, like a BYD or like a Tesla that can actually go and span all of these disciplines with the same people being able to the people in these various groups being able to talk to each other versus how like a Ford car or a like one of a major US appliance companies like stove is put together where in some sense there's like a corporate firewall between electronics box A and metal enclosure B for instance for instance can you talk about like zooming out if in terms of this reindustrialization reshoring uh industrial capacity what's at the top of the priority stock I mean there are a lot of memes about like do we really want to be doing screwing in iPhones and making those here uh we've talked a lot about DJI it seems like there's a huge gap between Chinese capability and consumer drone manufacturing versus American guess who makes DJI is that ID I won't say.
Okay. Um but but uh but then there's also like lower level potentially like higher skilled activities like battery manufacturing, lithium uh you know mineral extraction, all sorts of stuff.
Uh what how should we be thinking about it not just from a consumer perspective but from like a industrial capacity governmental perspective? Yeah.
So actually what's really interesting is if I go take an iPhone and I like part it all out on a table in front of me and I say who's actually doing the core engineering and IP of everything in the iPhone? It's actually like the US and our Asian allies like pretty much entirely, right?
Because Foxcon's a Taiwanese company. It's it's it's it's it's Taiwan. But no, but even all the parts like LG Intech makes the camera, Samsung makes the display, right? Yeah. A lot of Korean uh tech in there for sure. A lot of Korean and Japanese technology in there.
So, so, so the point though is where where is China really good? It's like it's like it's the assembly, the integration, being able to kind of span all of these disciplines.
Um so so if I was to f if I was saying what what I think is really important is um I think I think Noah Smith has a he's my tenant so I have to show him. Um but uh I think Noah Smith has a good take on this which is basically like the US is missing out on the technologies of the future.
And China actually has explicitly said this where they believe that the tech stack of the future is the electric tech stack.
Basically it's like it's like batteries, power electronics, um motors that it's like you can build a robot, you can build a drone, you can build a car, you can build smartphones and consumer electronics that spans the gamut of like that is the technology stack. Yeah. Yeah.
And in some and it's rare earth magnets, stuff like that. For some reason, the US just like I think it's basically the '08 recession and like a lack of manufacturing investment afterwards. Um meant that like we never actually picked up that stuff with one notable exception, which is Tesla. Yeah.
And so and and actually SpaceX as well. So like Elon did this twice. We should reverse engineer why. Um well that's why we're talking to Elon Musk of stoves. We're we're very happy. Many people have been saying this. People have also been calling you Noah Smith's landlord after you dropped that he's your tenant.
Effect on there. Uh thank you so much Sam for joining. Yeah. Before he can even say goodbye. Just sound effect. What were you gonna say? Beep beep. Thank you so much. Great to have you, Sam. I'm I'm excited for you and the team and keep us updated. I know there's big news coming. So drop it here first.
We love to have your back on. Talk to you soon. Bye. You know, a lot of people have been saying, "We need an American compliance company. We need an American company that helps you manage risk. We need an American company to prove trust continuously. " Continuously, we need a trust management. Head over to vanta. com.
Takes your manual work out of your security and compliance process and replaces it with continuous automation. Whether you're pursuing your first framework or managing a complex program, that's why Vanta. com exists. So, head over to Vanta. Vanta makes compliance fun. They didn't say that.
I said that because I've used Vanta. Fantastic. Well, we got Vince from Prime Intellect coming in the studio next. We're talking about uh bunch of stuff related to uh crypto and AI, GPU mining. I think this is going to be a very interesting conversation. We talked uh well, welcome